Contents
- Title page
- Introduction
- Introduction, continued
- Introduction, continued
- Fig. 1 - The causal relations of ontogeny, tokogeny, and phylogeny
- Outline of inferential relations in biological systematics
- Fig. 2 - relations between abductive inferences
- The formal definition of 'semaphoront,' Fig. 3
- The formal definition of 'species'
- Species hypotheses using sexual tokogenetic theory for intrinsic properties
- Fig. 4 - The inference of species hypotheses for sexually reproducing organisms, intrinsic properties
- Species hypotheses using sexual tokogenetic theory for relational properties
- Fig. 5 - The inference of species hypotheses for sexually reproducing organisms, relational properties
- Species hypotheses using heterogenetic theory
- Fig. 6 - The inference of species hypotheses for heterogenetically reproducing organisms
- Species hypotheses using asexual tokogenetic theory
- Fig. 7 - The inference of species hypotheses for asexually reproducing organisms
- The formal definition of 'supraspecific taxon'
- Fig. 8 - The inference of phylogenetic hypotheses for sexually reproducing organisms
- Fig. 9 - The inference of phylogenetic hypotheses for heterogenetically reproducing organisms
- Fig. 10 - The inference of phylogenetic hypotheses for asexually reproducing organisms
- Some general consequences
- Fig. 11 - The problem of temporal subjectivity in the inference of species hypotheses
- Some consequences for 'maximum likelihood' methods in phylogenetic systematics
- Fig. 12 - The context of 'maximum likelihood' methods is tokogenetic, not phylogenetic
|
Comments or Questions?
Home page
Information: CONTACT: Dr. Kirk Fitzhugh, Associate Curator of Polychaetes, Research & Collections Branch, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd, Los Angeles CA 90007, USA
Last updated: April 27, 2004 (Tuesday)

|